Re: [cc65] parameter and assembly precedures

From: Ullrich von Bassewitz (uz_at_musoftware.de)
Date: 2003-02-09 12:06:41

• Previous message: Ullrich von Bassewitz: "Re: [cc65] parameter and assembly precedures"
• In reply to: stefan: "Re: [cc65] parameter and assembly precedures"
• Next in thread: Michael McIntosh: "[cc65] How can I cause the "FILE NOT FOUND" msg to print to screen using existing kernal or basic routines for the C64?"

On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 03:37:42AM +0200, stefan wrote:
> i activated autoimport with
> .autoimport on. i thought that will do the import of dec and incsp for me.
> am i wrong ?

PLEASE READ THE DOCS! Here is the relevant paragraph:

  You should probably not use this switch because it delays error messages
  about undefined symbols until the link stage. The cc65 compiler (which is
  supposed to produce correct assembler code in all circumstances, something
  which is not true for most assembler programmers) will insert this command
  to avoid importing each and every routine from the runtime library.

Regards


        Uz


-- 
Ullrich von Bassewitz                                  uz_at_musoftware.de
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.

• Previous message: Ullrich von Bassewitz: "Re: [cc65] parameter and assembly precedures"
• In reply to: stefan: "Re: [cc65] parameter and assembly precedures"
• Next in thread: Michael McIntosh: "[cc65] How can I cause the "FILE NOT FOUND" msg to print to screen using existing kernal or basic routines for the C64?"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2003-02-09 12:06:47 CET