From: Christian Krüger (christian.krueger_at_pace.de)
Date: 2003-01-14 11:15:00
Hello, thank you very much for your answers. >It's called "volatile", and the keyword itself is parsed but ignored. Of course I meant 'volatile' - until now I used it very rarely - my fault. > > does declaring a 'call by value' as 'const' bring > > performance advantages? > > No. Hmm - I think this would be a very nice enhancement, because it could reduce the code size *and* the execution time. I hope it will have a little bit influence on the further development, if I liked that this feature should be on the 'wishlist...' ;-) When I think about it, I imagine that this could be something for the optimizer (independently of 'const')? Thanks again Uz for your support and your compiler. I will bribe you with a little present soon... Regards chrisker ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2003-01-14 11:16:00 CET