From: Ullrich von Bassewitz (uz_at_musoftware.de)
Date: 2003-01-08 08:20:27
Hi!
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 10:25:20AM +0100, Piotr Fusik wrote:
> BTW. here's another solution:
> char buffer[size + patchbytes];
> #define realbuffer ((char*) ((int) (buffer + patchbytes) & ~patchbytes))
While this solution avoids the additional pointer, the compiler will still do
address calculations at runtime. Using the assembler module solution generates
the best code in most situations.
Regards
Uz
--
Ullrich von Bassewitz uz_at_musoftware.de
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2003-01-08 08:20:31 CET