From: Groepaz (groepaz_at_gmx.net)
Date: 2002-12-11 03:01:13
On Wednesday 11 December 2002 01:07, Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 05:13:09PM +0100, Groepaz wrote:
> > yes ofcourse.... i would take the "some keys" as "normal" behaviour and
> > the "all keys" as the "keyrepeat" behaviour.... the "no repeats" thing
> > isnt much useful anyway :)
>
> I would prefer to have "no repeat" to be "no repeat" and not "some keys
> repeat and others not".
but then its kinda hard to restore the original state...mmmmhh, so then that
MUST be done in module destructor.
i still like the "some keys" thing better though, since ppl would get the
standard behaviour they are used to in any editor-type of routine. (and imho
thats a much more regular use than one were a "no repeat" behavior would be
better). i know a "no repeat" would be cleaner, but it can be simulated if
needed... the other way around (simulating repeat for some edit-keys) would
just regulary add additional work and overhead, much more than a missing
norepeat mode atleast.
--
___ ___ .___________________ .___________ _______.
c=64 / | \| \__ ___/ \ \_ _____/ \ \ [groepaz]
gb / ' \ | | | / \ / \ | __)_ / | \ gp32
cgb \ . / | | |/ ' \| \/ | \ psx
gba \___|_ /|___| |____|\____|__ /_______ /\____|__ / dc
-----\/-----'---------------\/--------\/---------\/
http://www.hitmen-console.org Hitmen WWW Headquarters
http://fly.to/hitmen-groepaz my personal playground
http://rr.c64.org/silversurfer home of the RR debugger
ftp.musoftware.de/pub/groepaz cc65 dump site
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2002-12-11 03:03:35 CET