From: Spiro Trikaliotis (Trik-news_at_gmx.de)
Date: 2002-12-04 11:17:05
Hello, Groepaz wrote: > after a quick peek... i wouldnt mind ALL filenames written by their absolute > pathes. :) (else the debugger for example needs to know about the location of > the library sources). i know this would mean you could no more debug code not > compiled on your machine, but then again thats a rare case anyway. (if you > want to debug library...hell, recompiling it first is recommended anyway > :=)). alternativly you could write the path(es) to search for files into the > debug-file or sth... i like the former idea better though :) I like it the way WinDBG does it: All files are absolute. Anyway, you can spefify additional dirs where WinDBG searches for sources it does not find at their "compiled-in" location. With the help of mtime and size, the debugger can even find out which file "fits best". This is almost the same as both of your options at once. Just my EUR 0.02, Spiro. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2002-12-04 11:14:37 CET