From: BlackJack/Civitas (blackjack_at_civitas64.de)
Date: 2002-11-13 22:11:23
On Wednesday 13 November 2002 21:42, Brian Bagnall wrote: > I'm pretty new to C but since Marc already supplied the necessary > functions in cbm.h then it should be as easy as making a wrapper > only. I kind of wonder if there are technical reasons why Marc didn't > implement stdio himself. The CBM routines work for me. And Ullrich want's everything to be standard compliant. So things are really portable. I have not enough sparetime to implement it. > I looked at fctrl.h and it looks like only about 6 functions need to > be defined. Two of them can't be defined (mkdir, rmdir), since the > 1541 has no ability to make directories. How should it deal with this > problem? The real problem is that "cbm" is not just the c64. So there are some more types of drives involved. I think it's just like the graphic library and the discussed RAM extension API, something that needs loadable modules. Sounds a bit odd as you'll need IO support then to load the modules that give IO support ;-) Ciao, Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch -- _ _____ __ __ _____________________________________________________ / __/ /_/ \_\ CiViTAS - "Lameness rulez" / / ____ ____ http://www.civitas64.de/ \ \_ / /\ \/ /\ \ mailto:blackjack_at_civitas64.de \___/_/ \__/ \_\ C64 forever... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2002-11-13 22:11:36 CET