Re: [cc65] statics in zero page

From: Ullrich von Bassewitz (uz_at_musoftware.de)
Date: 2002-05-22 10:01:18

• Previous message: Ullrich von Bassewitz: "[cc65] Floating point support"
• In reply to: Matt Ackeret: "Re: [cc65] statics in zero page"
• Next in thread: Keates, Mark: "RE: [cc65] statics in zero page"

Hi!

On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 03:00:30PM -0700, Matt Ackeret wrote:
> I mean, you guys basically want the optimizer to deal with 0x00-0xFF specially,
> right?  So isn't there any way you could have a keyword and you could
> assign it yourself at the same time?

This proposal has the same problem as the zstatic keyword (in fact, besides
the name you've choosen, it's identical including all pros and cons).

Regards


        Uz


-- 
Ullrich von Bassewitz                                  uz_at_musoftware.de
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.

• Previous message: Ullrich von Bassewitz: "[cc65] Floating point support"
• In reply to: Matt Ackeret: "Re: [cc65] statics in zero page"
• Next in thread: Keates, Mark: "RE: [cc65] statics in zero page"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2002-05-22 10:01:25 CEST