Re: [cc65] how about commercial prgs?

Date view Thread view Subject view

From: Mike McCarty (jmccarty_at_ssd.usa.alcatel.com)
Date: 2002-03-28 18:19:30


On Thu, 28 Mar 2002, Andre Majorel wrote:

> On 2002-03-28 10:01 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:
> 
> > > Q: Can I use SDL in a commercial application?
> > > 
> > > A: The simple answer is "Yes", just dynamically link with SDL and
> > > you're fine.
> > >
> > > Full details are available at: http://www.libsdl.org/license.html
> > 
> > The simple answer is "No".
> > 
> > I went and read their full details, and one is absolutely prohibited
> > from actually linking their product into a program.
> 
> Your reading of their license is probably incorrect.

I doubt it, as the rest of your message shows.

> If library X is LGPL'd, it is legal to dynamically link
> proprietary code with it.

If you read what I wrote, I did not use the phrase "dynamically link",
I used the phrase "actually link".

> If that wasn't the case, there wouldn't be any commercial
> applications on Linux, since glibc is LPGL'd.
> 
> What is illegal is
> - *statically* linking non GPL/LGPL code with LGPL code,
> - linking in any fashion non GPL/LGPL code with GPL code.

Yep, exactly what I said.

Mike
-- 
char *p="char *p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I don't speak for Alcatel      <- They make me say that.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.


Date view Thread view Subject view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2002-03-28 18:20:27 CET