Re[4]: [cc65] dummy questions...

From: groepaz (groepaz_at_gmx.net)
Date: 2002-02-16 12:44:02

• Previous message: Piotr Fusik: "Re: Re[2]: [cc65] dummy questions..."
• In reply to: Piotr Fusik: "Re: Re[2]: [cc65] dummy questions..."
• Next in thread: Marko Mäkelä: "Re: [cc65] dummy questions..."
• Next in thread: Matt Ackeret: "Re: [cc65] library header bug correction - and some compiler hazzle"
• Reply: Marko Mäkelä: "Re: [cc65] dummy questions..."
• Reply: Mike McCarty: "Re: Re[4]: [cc65] dummy questions..."

Hello Piotr,

Saturday, February 16, 2002, 11:38:58 AM, you wrote:

PF> On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, groepaz wrote:

>> ohh good idea on the one hand (and i happen to have such a routine
>> laying around aswell hehe) but on the other thats not quite a standard
>> benchmark :=p i was more thinking of things like the dhrystone test
>> (that has been run on many machines before so you can actually compare
>> the c64 to a cray or whatever ;D)
>>
PF> How about "Hanoi Towers" ? It's in gcc.

oooh good idea.... towers of hanoi can serve as a pretty good
programming example aswell ;0)

-- 
Best regards,
 groepaz                            mailto:groepaz_at_gmx.net


----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.

• Previous message: Piotr Fusik: "Re: Re[2]: [cc65] dummy questions..."
• In reply to: Piotr Fusik: "Re: Re[2]: [cc65] dummy questions..."
• Next in thread: Marko Mäkelä: "Re: [cc65] dummy questions..."
• Next in thread: Matt Ackeret: "Re: [cc65] library header bug correction - and some compiler hazzle"
• Reply: Marko Mäkelä: "Re: [cc65] dummy questions..."
• Reply: Mike McCarty: "Re: Re[4]: [cc65] dummy questions..."

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2002-02-16 12:44:46 CET