Re[2]: [cc65] dummy questions...

From: groepaz (groepaz_at_gmx.net)
Date: 2002-02-14 20:16:37

• Previous message: groepaz: "Re[2]: [cc65] NT: www.cc65.org down ?"
• In reply to: Matt Ackeret: "Re: [cc65] dummy questions..."
• Next in thread: Ullrich von Bassewitz: "Re: [cc65] dummy questions..."
• Next in thread: Matt Ackeret: "Re: [cc65] library header bug correction - and some compiler hazzle"

Hello Matt,

MA> but anyway -- dumb question..

MA> Could you at least make it so that attempts to do the above un-supported
MA> things were COMPILER ERRORS, if they don't do it now?  I mean, instead of
MA> generating bogus code, at least recognizing what it can't do, and stopping
MA> compilation would be good.

its like that ofcoz :o) _I_ just asked coz in certain cases in the
testsuite its not 100% clear to me whats happening at all (you can
write really fuckedup and unreadable shit in C hehe ;D) so i wasnt
sure what was actually the course for the errors i got.

-- 
Best regards,
 groepaz                            mailto:groepaz_at_gmx.net


----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.

• Previous message: groepaz: "Re[2]: [cc65] NT: www.cc65.org down ?"
• In reply to: Matt Ackeret: "Re: [cc65] dummy questions..."
• Next in thread: Ullrich von Bassewitz: "Re: [cc65] dummy questions..."
• Next in thread: Matt Ackeret: "Re: [cc65] library header bug correction - and some compiler hazzle"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2002-02-14 20:17:24 CET