From: Mike McCarty (jmccarty_at_ssd.usa.alcatel.com)
Date: 2001-11-06 18:11:09
On Mon, 5 Nov 2001, Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 12:13:33PM +0100, groepaz wrote:
> > and seriously, i still want a traditional .org directive (thats one
> > thing really missing in ca65 IMHO) ... its kinda annyoing to eg write
> > drivecode embedded in your sources this way ;/
>
> There is no way to have a traditional .org directive if you have relocatable
> code. And, seriously, I think that having relocatable code is far more useful
> than an old style .ORG directive.
Yes there is. It makes perfect sense that if X is a relocatable symbol,
that one can write
.org X+10
especially if X is the symbol for the current location counter, and
produce relocatable code.
[snip]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2001-12-14 22:05:44 CET