[cc65] Inline vs. macro problems

From: Ullrich von Bassewitz (uz_at_musoftware.de)
Date: 2001-10-11 23:30:37

• Next message: groepaz: "Re[2]: [cc65] Package locations"
• Previous message: groepaz: "Re[2]: [cc65] Package locations"
• In reply to: groepaz: "Re[2]: [cc65] Package locations"
• Next in thread: atheist_at_hellspawn.dnsalias.net: "Re: [cc65] Package locations"

Hi!

On Thu, Oct 11, 2001 at 11:26:39PM +0200, groepaz wrote:
> mmmh should it compile correctly with mingw32 then? .... gotta try this ;=P

Yes, this should work. It will also compile with other compilers that are able
to inline functions, but these compilers will need a small change in the
inline.h header file.

Regards


        Uz


-- 
Ullrich von Bassewitz                                  uz_at_musoftware.de
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.

• Next message: groepaz: "Re[2]: [cc65] Package locations"
• Previous message: groepaz: "Re[2]: [cc65] Package locations"
• In reply to: groepaz: "Re[2]: [cc65] Package locations"
• Next in thread: atheist_at_hellspawn.dnsalias.net: "Re: [cc65] Package locations"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2001-12-14 22:05:42 CET