From: Mike McCarty (jmccarty_at_ssd.usa.alcatel.com)
Date: 2001-06-25 20:45:56
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, groepaz wrote:
> Hello Mike,
>
> MM> The kinds of "optimizations" I have used with hand-coded assembler are
> MM> those of selecting any of several equivalent instructions which take
> MM> less space or use fewer bytes. An example of this is automatically
> MM> selecting either "long" or "short" form jumps automatically, depending
> MM> on how far away the destination is from the jump.
>
> ehrm... since when are there different long and short forms of jump
> instructions on the 6510 ? are you mixing up the ca65-builtin macros
> with real assembler instructions ?
Please point out in my message where I said there were.
If you choose to reply to messages, you should take the courtesy to
read them carefully in their context.
I replied to a question. The question was not
What kinds of optimizations are appropriate for an assembler to
perform on hand-generated 65xx code?
Mike
--
char *p="char *p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I don't speak for Alcatel <- They make me say that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2001-12-14 22:05:40 CET