From: Mike McCarty (jmccarty_at_ssd.usa.alcatel.com)
Date: 2001-01-02 22:22:44
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Spiro Trikaliotis wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > Or, better,
> >
> > while ((c = *value) != 39 && c != 62) {
> > <stuff>
> > }
>
> Forgive me, but if my memory serves me right, C (at least pre-ANSI) does NOT
> define the order in which this will be evaluated, so the second part (c!=62)
> might be evaluated BEFORE the first part with the assignment, in that case,
> this will NOT evaluate to the expected condition.
I forgive you for your poor memory.
Mike
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2001-12-14 22:05:37 CET