From: troy silvey (tbsilvey_at_juno.com)
Date: 2000-12-31 22:05:09
>This *is* using pointers. The #define says >... >"Handle the numeric value 0xD000 as a pointer to an unsigned char, >then dereference this pointer". >... >There are areas where this is true for cc65, but in the case you've >choosen, you're mostly wasting your time. Thanks for clearing all of that up for me. >Just have a look at the generated assembler code yourself. I've had a look, and CC65 is doing excellent code. If I get far enough in this little project, I would like to actually have it fit in a 16k cartridge for the 64. So I'm trying to balance doing the project completly in C and still have as much space available as possible. So in the end I may or may not need to trim undeeded parts of libs and structs. I'm still learning so I don't even know if that will be necessary. I know I can compact more with strait asm, but this is all about learning C for me. And having an actuall product at the end makes it more fun. Thanks for all the help so far, I am progressing very quickly now. troy ________________________________________________________________ GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2001-12-14 22:05:37 CET