Re: [cc65] cc65 and VICE

From: Ullrich von Bassewitz (uz_at_musoftware.de)
Date: 2000-01-22 21:26:23

• Next message: Ullrich von Bassewitz: "Re: Sv: [cc65] Back on Track"
• Previous message: Spiro Trikaliotis: "Re: Sv: [cc65] Back on Track"
• In reply to: Spiro Trikaliotis: "Re: [cc65] cc65 and VICE"

> When calling a function, you perform the following:
>
> Assume the pointer to the frame is called stackframe_p.
> When calling a subroutine, you actually do:
>
> PUSH( stackframe_p );
> stackframe_p = ...;

You are completely right. This works and it is fully reentrant. It is some
overhead, but it should make creating debugging information easier.

Regards


	Uz


--
Ullrich von Bassewitz                                  uz_at_musoftware.de
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.

• Next message: Ullrich von Bassewitz: "Re: Sv: [cc65] Back on Track"
• Previous message: Spiro Trikaliotis: "Re: Sv: [cc65] Back on Track"
• In reply to: Spiro Trikaliotis: "Re: [cc65] cc65 and VICE"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2001-12-14 22:05:35 CET