Re: [cc65] Interrupt handlers in C as part of the C library ?

From: Spiro Trikaliotis <ml-cc651trikaliotis.net>
Date: 2012-01-22 09:48:45
Hello Uz,

* On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 11:03:16PM +0100 Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 02:20:49PM +0100, Oliver Schmidt wrote:
> > >> typedef unsigned (*irq_handler) (void);
> > >
> > > Bad style, I would highly advise to use the "int".
[...]
> My suggestion was actually to use "unsigned char", not "unsigned". But apart
> from that, I do not agree with Spiro. Using "int" in every place is a bad
> idea. I've suffered from some nasty bugs in the past that were caused by this
> "everything must be an int" rule.

I think I was not clear in what I meant. So, to be more precise: Instead
of writing "unsigned", write "unsigned int".

Regards,
Spiro.

-- 
Spiro R. Trikaliotis                              http://opencbm.sf.net/
http://www.trikaliotis.net/                      http://vice-emu.sf.net/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Sun Jan 22 09:49:03 2012

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2012-01-22 09:49:07 CET