[cc65] Difference between __fastcall and __fastcall__ ?

From: Payton Byrd <plbyrd1gmail.com>
Date: 2010-05-03 03:11:40
I'm using Visual Studio 2010 as my IDE and for the most part it's totally
cool with the cc65 specific source files.  The only that that trips it up is
the __fastcall__ convention with two trailing underscores.  VS 2010 actually
recognizes __fastcall as a keyword and colors it appropriately so long as it
doesn't have the trailing spaces.  Is __fastcall a standard convention that
means the same thing as __fastcall__ in cc65?

The reason I ask is that Intellisense for VS 2010 does a great job with my
sources, but not so much with the header files in the cc65/include folder.
 The reason why is that it thinks that the __fastcall__ macro is an error
and so each and every function defined in the include files parses as an
error and there are literally over 100 intellisense errors reported on the
header files.  It's nothing *important* for this to work, but it would be
nice if it did.  If cc65 could accept __fastcall as the same thing as
__fastcall__ then the header files could be updated to the __fastcall
convention and intellisense would be happy which would make VS just that
much more awesome for cc65 development (which it is already pretty awesome).

-- 
Payton Byrd
<http://www.paytonbyrd.com>
<http://it.toolbox.com/blogs/paytonbyrd>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Mon May 3 03:12:09 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2010-05-03 03:12:13 CEST