Re: [cc65] Support for the EMMA II system?

From: Ullrich von Bassewitz <uz1musoftware.de>
Date: 2004-04-29 10:19:29
Hi!

On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 08:33:32AM +0300, Mats Byggmastar wrote:
> To make things even worse, the 1.5 KB is not continous,
> it's 512 byte at $0200 and 1024 byte at $0C00.
> I've put CODE into the 1024 byte block and the other
> segments into the 512 byte block.

You do also need a software stack that is used for passing parameters and
allocating local variables. This stack can grow from the top of the smaller
chunk downwards.

Having dynamic memory is impossible with splitted memory and the current heap
implementation, but it would be quite ambitous with just 1.5K RAM anyway:-)

Regards


	Uz


-- 
Ullrich von Bassewitz                                  uz@musoftware.de
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Thu Apr 29 10:19:32 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2004-04-29 10:19:38 CEST