Re: [cc65] loadpaintmagic

Date view Thread view Subject view

From: Tim Schürmann (tischuer_at_web.de)
Date: 2003-02-01 14:50:38 

Hi!

Ullrich von Bassewitz schrieb:

> > Yes, it use CBM file I/O.
> >
> > Hm. Does the use of the standard C file routines make a sence in this context?
>
> The correct question here would be: Does the use of CBM file routines make
> sense in this context? What do you gain by using non portable code? Is it
> really worth the trouble writing non portable code?

[...]

Yes, you are right. Normaly i try to write portable code. But my original program
is/will be C64 specific (loadpaintmagic is a by-product).
I was surprised when groepaz wrote, that it could be used on a cbm610 and/or C128
aswell.

Anyway. I've changed the CBM-routines to standard C routines.
Regarding to this, there are two questions left:

1. Is it right, that "fseek" is not available for the C64?

2. The C file I/O-routines won't work in VICE with true drive emulation enabled
(i've tried Version 1.7, 1.9 and 1.10). Is this behaviour "correct"? (the
CBM-routines are working).

Bye,

Tim Schürmann
tischuer_at_web.de

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo_at_musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.

Date view Thread view Subject view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 2003-02-01 14:51:08 CET